Category Archives: Physics

Physics

Zeleny's Hadron Decay Wolfram Demonstration added

Leave a comment

This weekend I integrated a fantastic demonstration by Zeleny which allows the visualization of the composite Quark particle decays. I’ve integrated it into the sixth (Hadron) pane which starts with Blinder’s demonstration to visualize the composite Quark-Gluon particles. These demonstrations are extended by allowing the selection of 2 Quark Mesons, 3 Quark Baryons and recently discovered 4 and 6 Quark Hadrons and also drives content of the E8 sub group projection pane (#3). I also added a query to show all experimentally discovered composite Meson/Baryon particles with the same quark content and added a decay mode button when decays are in Wolfram’s ParticleData Group curated data set.

decays

hadrons

Physics

New TheoryOfEverything Visualizer Features

Leave a comment

I cleaned up some of the N-Body physics screens, and created a few animation sequences showing the simulation runs available (if you have Mathematica and source code (available upon request and appropriate use-case)).

This is a video of a preliminary Galaxy formation in N-Body gravitational physics.

This is a video of the solar system (not yet using the OpenCL N-Body code for GPU parallelism).

This is a video of the Compton Effect in 3D, which I plan on using to show how Big Bang Inflationary Quantum effects are explained.

outNBodyPhys

outNBodyPhoton

I’ve also improved the capabilities of the other demonstrations.

outHadron

Physics

I've added an N-Body Gravitational Simulation Pane and enhanced the Composite Quark Hadron Model Pane

Leave a comment

The N-Body Gravitational Simulation (not yet complete) uses Mathematica’s OpenCL GPU computing capability to simulate standard (Solar System), GR (Black Hole Centered Galaxy formation), Large Scale Universal Structure, and Quantum GR (Big Bang Inflationary) physics.

I’ve consolidated the Meson/Baryon panes into a single Hadron pane that now includes the formation of the recently validated TetraQuark Hadrons.

Please see ToE_Demonstration.cdf or as an interactive web page) that takes you on an integrated visual journey from the abstract elements of hyper-dimensional geometry, algebra, particle and nuclear physics, and on to the atomic elements of chemistry. It requires the free Mathematica CDF plugin (25 Mb). ToE_Demonstration.nb is the same as CDF except it includes file I/O capability not available in the free CDF player. This requires a full Mathematica license (25 Mb).

outNBody-1b

outNBody-1a

QM-GR-N-Body

Meson

Baryon

TetraQuark

Physics

Added PMNS and CKM particle mixing matrix calculations to ToE_Demonstration.CDF

Leave a comment

I’ve improved on a great Wolfram demonstration from Balázs Meszéna on Neutrino Oscillations by adding capabilities to view both the PMNS and CKM unitary triangle matrices, print and reference my ToE Neutrino mass predictions, which now accomodate the Koide relationships in particle masses.

Check out the new demonstrations using free interactive web plugin , .CDF, or .NB (for licensed Mathematica users) and social media integrations for comments, pages and posts.

This new pane (#5) presents the Unitarity of CP=T violations by combining the Lepton (Neutrino) Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix (PMNS) with the Quark Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) mixing matrix calculations through the Quark-Lepton Complementarity (QLC).

I am also working to incorporate the Koide particle mass relations to MyToE predictions.

ToE_Demonstration

JGM_ToE-15t

Code snippets showing the CKM and PMNS matrix calculations based on the UI.

JGM_ToE-15v

JGM_ToE-15u

Physics

E8 folding to H4+H4/φ

Leave a comment

I found the rotation matrix that shows the E8 Dynkin diagram can indeed be folded to H4+H4/φ.

The H4 and its 120 vertices make up the 4D 600 Cell. It is made up of 96 vertices of the Snub 24-Cell and the 24 vertices of the 24-Cell=[16 vertex Tesseract=8-Cell and the 8 vertices of the 4-Orthoplex=16-Cell]).

It can be generated from the 240 split real even E8 vertices using a 4×8 rotation matrix:
x = (1, φ, 0, -1, φ, 0, 0, 0)
y = (φ, 0, 1, φ, 0, -1, 0, 0)
z = (0, 1, φ, 0, -1, φ, 0, 0)
w = (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, φ^2, 1/φ)

where φ=Golden Ratio=(1+Sqrt(5))/2

It is also interesting to note that the x, y, and z vectors project to a hull of the 3D Rhombic Triacontrahedron from the 6D 6 cube Hexaract (which then generates the hull of the Dodecahedron and Icosahedron Platonic solids).

Here’s a look at the Dynkin Diagram folding of E8 to H4+H4/φ:

E8-H4-Fold

I find in folding from 8D to 4D, that the 6720 edge counts split into two sets of 3360 from E8’s 6720 length Sqrt(2), but the combined edges and vertices recreate the E8 petrie diagram perfectly.

Some visualizations of this in 8D:
E8-8D-Polytopes-2

to 4D:
E8-4D-Polychora-2

and also showing the Rhombic Triacontrahedron folding from 6D:
E8-6D-StarPolytopes-2

to 3D:
E8-3D-Platonic-2

Physics

Another look at integrating the Pascal Triangle to Clifford Algebra, E8 Lie Algebra/Groups, Octonions and Particle Physics Standard Model

Leave a comment

Pascal-g

Modified Lisi split real even E8 particle assignment quantum bit patterns:

Lisi_Particle_Assignments

Assigning a specific mass, length, time, and charge metrics based on new dimensional relationships and the Planck constant (which defines Higgs mass).

ToEsummary

The split real even E8 group used has been determined from this simple root matrix (which gives the Cartan matrix upon dot product with a transpose of itself):

DynkinE8Full.svg

This Dynkin diagram builds the Cartan matrix and determines the root/weight/height with corresponding Hasse diagrams.

E8Hasse

E8HassePoset.svg

Physics

More amplituhedron capability (projected hull surface area and volume)

Leave a comment

Getting more capability built into ToE_Demonstration.nb where it can now calculate the scattering amplitude by calculating the volume of the projected hull of selected edges in the n-Simplex Amplituhedron (based on a theory by Nima Arkani-Hamed, with some Mathematica code from J. Bourjaily for the positroid diagram). Of course, there is still much work to get this wrapped up…

A few more pics of Positive Grassmannian Amplituhedrons…
amplituhedron-0b

amplituhedron-0c
This last diagram is obtained using the following amplituhedron0.m as input to the ToE_Demonstration.nb (when using fully licensed Mathematica) as shown below:
* This is an auto generated list from ToE_Demonstration.nb *)
new := {
artPrint=True;
scale=0.1;
cylR=0.018;
range=2.;
pt={-0.3, 0.0, 0.6};
favorite=1;
showAxes=False;
showEdges=True;
showPolySurfaces=True;
eColorPos=False;
dimTrim=5;
ds=6;
pListName=”First8″;
dsName=”nSimplex”;
p3D=” 3D”;
edgeVals={{Sqrt[11/2], 8}, {Sqrt[9/2 – Sqrt[2]], 4}, {Sqrt[9/2 + Sqrt[2]], 4}};
};new;

Positroid Diagrams:
amplituhedron-0a